This blog post will focus on the representations of different types of masculinity in last week's episode of Modern Family, “Treehouse.” For all of its strides in representing queer characters in a positive light, Modern Family still adheres to many of the conventional binaries of masculine/feminine and straight/gay. I find Modern Family an interesting subject, because of its representation of “nontraditional” relationships alongside the traditional nuclear family, and because all are presented as equally quirky. Modern Family has been received with popular and critical acclaim since its premiere in 2009; each adult member of the regular cast has been nominated for an Emmy Award, the first win going to Eric Stonestreet, a straight man, for his portrayal of Cameron Tucker, a gay character. For those unfamiliar with Modern Family, the sitcom centers around three branches of the Pritchett family: Jay, the patriarch of the family, and his much younger Colombian wife Gloria represent a May-December relationship; Claire, who is Jay's daughter, and her husband Phil represent the traditional, suburban nuclear family, along with their three children; Mitchell, who is Jay's son, and his partner Cameron represent a “nontraditional” gay family, along with their adopted daughter Lily.
I apply the term “nontraditional” to Mitchell and Cameron lightly, because the only nontraditional thing about them is the fact that they are represented; their sexuality is not unusual, merely the fact that they are visible on mainstream television. In all other regards, Mitchell and Cameron are unmarked: they are financially comfortable white men, who live in a suburban area. All of the aspects of their lifestyle – their nicely decorated home, their high taste in food, their put-together wardrobes – are the well-respected markers of gay men. As far as the portrayals of masculinity, Mitchell, as a lawyer, is the breadwinner of the household; Cameron gave up a career as a music teacher to raise their child. Cameron is more “flamboyant” than Mitchell, in terms of fashion, speech, and mannerisms. These aspects of their relationship uphold the masculine/feminine binary; the only way a gay couple could be well-received by a wide audience is if they only deviate from traditional gender roles and heteronormativity in one way.
In this particular episode, the A storyline revolves around Mitchell's challenge to Cameron to pass as a straight man and get a woman's phone number in a bar. Cameron asserts, “I could totally pick up any woman in here...I for sure could be a womanizer,” to which Mitchell retorts, “Or you could be someone who just stepped out of a machine called 'The Womanizer.'” Cameron immediately connects being a straight man with being a womanizer, as if the opposite of a gay man is hypermasculinity; Mitchell's response immediately correlates homosexuality with overt femininity. When Cameron approaches a woman as a straight man, he deepens his voice and changes his body language, so that all of his movements are led by his broadened shoulders. He sheds any physical markers that are associated with homosexuality and overcompensates with hypermasculine ones.
Cameron does succeed in getting a woman's phone number, but feels guilty and meets up with her later to confess; she is confused as to why he reveals that he is gay when she knew all along. Katie matter-of-factly states how obvious it is that he is gay, from “The way you talk and walk and dress, and your theatrical hand gestures.” If there even is such a thing as multiple masculinities or any masculinity other than the ideal in the world of Modern Family, the difference between them and the ideal is obvious and unequivocal. Male femininity and/or homosexuality are signaled by a certain manner of comportment distinct from that of straight, traditionally masculine men.
When Cameron asks Katie why she would offer her number to a man she knew to be gay, she responds, again matter-of-factly, “Oh, because I want a gay friend. Someone I can dish with, can give me guy advice, I can shop with.” Cameron reels back, appalled at the heavy stock she puts in such caricatures of gay men, saying, “Those are totally offensive stereotypes!” He is offended by the cartoonish stock character traits that have been assigned to all gay men wholesale, and for a moment the audience empathizes with him. Within the next second, however, she continues, “We could go see Julia Roberts movies together,” at which Cameron perks up and excitedly shares, “I know and she's as nice as she seems onscreen!” Their conversation picks up, “Shut up, really?! Is she?” “She is, yeah.” Just as seen in the How I Met Your Mother episode I analyzed in my last post, the producers of Modern Family put forward an idea that challenges traditional conventions of gender and sexuality, only to retreat immediately. As quickly as Cameron expresses offense at Katie's belief in farcical stereotypes about gay men, he falls into those exact stereotypes, with the gossipy tone of a teenage girl. The producers offer a progressive piece of dialogue that attempts to break down binaries, but immediately rescind it by forcing this gay character back into the only acceptable classifiers to a mainstream audience – easily excitable, attracted to products generally aimed at women, etc.
Given its mass appeal and popularity, I think it is safe to assume that part of the reason why Modern Family is so well-received is because it portrays an accurate yet humorous model of the real world – including how stereotypes about masculinity function. We know that these binaries between masculine/feminine and straight/gay exist in our world, along with people who defy them. There is a huge discrepancy in the representation of such people in popular media. I am a fan of Modern Family and I understand the need to attract and keep a wide audience. I also understand that small steps in the direction of progression are better than none. Perhaps soon enough, though, with all the small steps that have been taken by shows like Modern Family, Grey's Anatomy, and Glee by representing queer characters in the first place, the wide audience will be ready for dialogue that breaks down binaries and does not retreat immediately. I urge popular media to continue its slow progression in portraying multiple masculinities/femininities, but without feeling the need to qualify.
You can watch "Treehouse" here.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I actually follow Modern Family and have seen this episode. And I did find it interesting that like How I Met Your Mother, Modern Family introduced something to only take it back. I've noticed that with Mitchell and Cameron one is more feminine than the other but I never really took the time to notice that they made them in a way "normal" for viewers by creating a homemaker and a breadwinner role for the couple. Also you mentioned how Cameron thought he picked up a woman but she knew all along he was gay and how Cameron seemed offended how she stereotyped him. But what about Claire in this episode? I remember that she too assumed that a man was gay but he was really straight. She also used character markers and in her head came to a conclusion that a man was gay merely because he was hanging around Mitchell and his friends, who are also gay. What do you think about Claire in this episode?
ReplyDeleteHi vcuiriz, that's an excellent point about Claire. I didn't include an analysis of her in this post because that storyline is actually from the previous episode, "Go Bullfrogs!" It's a great example of the plethora of gender issues present on TV right now, especially on Modern Family.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your observations, that Claire labeled a straight man as gay because he was hanging out with gay men and because of markers such as dress, hairstyle, physique, speech. The joke here was that he was, in fact, French. "Gay or European" is so interesting to me because the unmarked characteristics of straight European men are often read as marked signals of homosexuality to Americans. Misunderstandings like this should force us to consider multiple masculinities and the differences in ideal/normalized gender expression between cultures.
At the risk of getting too tangential, here is a video of the number "Gay or European" from Legally Blonde the Musical: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pCybcpkm5c . It also handles this topic in a humorous way. The scene is set at a trial, where the prosecution witness has just lied about having an affair with the defendant. The defendant's legal team tries to figure out if the witness is actually "Gay or European." If he is gay, he has perjured himself; if he is straight and European, he could be telling the truth. Watch the video if you like; the set up at the beginning is important but you can just watch from the start of the song at 2:43. Lyrics are included on-screen, which is helpful because the humor of the scene is in the lyrics.
I have a confession, I like Modern Family x]. But i definitely agree that the representation of gay characters plays into hetero-normative society in that Cameron is pretty much the "stay at home mom". Since society already has a hard time viewing and accepting those that are not confined as the "norm", an easy way to introduce queer characters is to have them follow traditional roles that are familiar to the audiences. Even if having gay characters on the set is one step up, there is still a lot of progress needed in order to go away from the gay stereotypes.
ReplyDeleteI think it is great that you showed how a show that is said to represent queer characters in a positive light, still is based off gender binaries which perpetuate stereotypes. The fact that Cameron changed his voice and body language to appear like a straight man shows how deeply gender characteristics are embedded in our society. I also found it interested how you observed that when there are moments in shows that challenge stereotypes of gay characters, they "retreat immediately". I think that shows do this to lighten the moment. They don’t want the audience to feel that the show they are watch is “too political", so they try to make a funny moment out of it. This is sad because when they retreat, they take the suggestive message back and continue to perpetuate stereotypes.
ReplyDeleteI ran into your exact situation when I was writing last week: I read something progressive, rejoiced, and then was thoroughly disappointed when the very next statement rescinded that enlightenment with a joke. I think it is true that in our culture, we must spoon feed these issues to the masses with little lumps of sugar. As people become more habituated, change can slowly progress. Unfortunately this is still a far cry from Novela Novela which illustrated how the telenovela series, Sexto Sentido, tackles issues of homosexual stereotypes and does not defer to humor to soften the blow. The producers of the show even listen to their viewers and then challenge their ideals further by writing them into the script. In the US, although Modern Family is still playing to the safe side, it is certainly a step in the positive direction.
ReplyDeleteI too watch Modern Family every week, and I found it interesting that you saw Cameron to be more "feminine" than Mitchell. I concede that in some ways that is true, but Mitchell also has some less-than-masculine characteristics about him, such as his speech and some mannerisms he uses. I guess I'd say he is more traditionally masculine in the sense that he is the breadwinner of the household and is less emotionally-driven than Cam. Ultimately I feel that while Modern Family does definitely play into gay stereotypes and portrays a gay couple in the context of the gender binary, they do so less than other shows as I see masculine and feminine traits in both Cameron and Mitchell. There is still progress to be made to move away from stereotypes, but I think this show is headed in the right direction.
ReplyDeleteI never understood why people liked watching Modern Family so much, and then I watched a couple episodes and totally understood why. I completely agree with your statement that at least making small progressive steps is better than none at all. I remember watching an award show and after Modern Family won best comedy, the producers I assume, told a story about a gay couple who came up to them and thanked them for everything they did because they thought the show had brought more acceptance to gay couples. While there still may be a some stereotyping going on within the show and they arent totally breaking down barriers, I think it's amazing that they are being recognized for what they have been doing. Any acknowledgment is better that none.
ReplyDelete-Kristina Wedseltoft
Hi Carolyn,
ReplyDeleteAfter reading your comment, I gave the masculinity and femininity of Cameron and Mitchell some more thought. I think you are right, the breadwinner/stay-at-home parent model is probably the only way they conform totally to heteronormativity. Cameron is often portrayed as the overly dramatic gay man with a pitchy voice, but the show likes to balance this out particularly with his college football career and his experience of growing up on a farm, operating heavy machinery. Mitchell is usually portrayed as more stolid and reserved in comparison to his partner, but this is balanced by a preference for "girly" hobbies (e.g. ice dancing as a child and musical theatre) and an aversion to "boyish" hobbies (e.g. blowing things up).
On the whole, Modern Family still conforms to the model of heteronormativity, but makes strides in terms of queer representation in popular media in spite of this.
This post focuses on the representations of different types of masculinity in an episode of Modern Family, “Treehouse.” I agree with the author that a unique aspect about the show is the representation of the “nontraditional” family. Additionally, I agree that the characters of Mitchell and Cameron are unmarked because they are representing that gay community as two stable white males. I think that this makes the show much more homogenized on television. Besides the characters of Sofia Vergara and the boy who plays her son, the show expresses a modern family of successful Caucasians. I am glad the author both praised the show for taking a step in the right direction, but also criticized the show for not having a more diverse depiction of people. It would be interesting if Mitchell or Cameron were African American, or Asian American and see if that would have any impact on the show. Again, this goes back to the idea of encoded and decoded messages. The normative whether this also includes a queer community gets depicted as mainly white.
ReplyDeleteThis blog discussed earlier how How I Met Your Mother also made some progressive comments, but does not follow up on them and retracts them. I think the similarity here is that both How I Met Your Mother and Modern Family play everything for comedic effect, so when they see an opportunity to make a joke that is humorous to the majority, they take it. Such as in Modern Family, the situation of Cameron taking offense at gay stereotypes but then falling into those stereotypes is done for comedy as the audience can clearly see that irony.
ReplyDeleteWell Said! I remember thinking the exact same thing about the gender norming and masculine/feminine binary during Cameron's scene in this episode. I also observed this same type hyper norming on the most recent episode, "After the Fire," when Cameron becomes very offended when he believes the family not to trust him driving a large truck because he's gay. He over compensates, ends up needing help, and then reciprocates the same stereotypical gender norming that upset him in the first place. Modern family however is a unique creation because their very premise is to ridicule the reality television craze. It could then be said that they are also intending solely for a comedic dialogue that plays to ridiculous stereotypes to attract viewers attention. These stereotypes are implanted in every character from Jay all the way down to lilly. Old man/young wife. Two kids...boy and girl. One gay one straight. Gay couple has hypermasculine/overtfeminine. They adopt asian baby..etc. They point being that taken at face value for comedic escape might be the only interrogation this show may need.
ReplyDeleteThis is a really interesting aspect of representations of homosexuality today. There is definitely this idea that it has its own body language and appearance. I have always found this bizarre since I've never seen the connection between your sexuality and the kind of clothes you buy or what kind of movies you like. Also, the humor that comes out in representations of flamboyant homosexuality, usually feminine men, always seems to make femininity in general a point of ridicule, which I find unsettling.
ReplyDeleteIt's also really strange, but not unexpected, to me how these shows retract all their movements towards breaking stereotypes by making their characters fit the same stereotypes. I guess it's good to be attempting to break those boundaries at all in the first place. However, I feel like there's a danger in having these kinds of shows still fit their characters into these boxes. Since people look at these representations as being more progressive because of the foundation of the show, I think they take the representations more seriously. It seems to me that this kind of holding back only further engrains these stereotypes of what it means to be gay or straight.
At the same time, it's good to move forward in any way sometimes and a lot of people I know really like this show (I've never seen it) so I think it's great that it's actually representing a gay couple, even if the rest of their characters conform to normative identities.
First, I wanted to start off how I thought it was interesting how gendered one of the comments was regarding Cameron being a stay-at-home parent, and how he was referred to as a "stay-at-home mom". I recall in a season two episode of Modern Family, Cameron becomes offended that he is treated as Lilly's mother by Mitchell and their friends. However, at the end of the episode, Mitchell explains that Cameron is seen as maternal because he is warm and loving, which are maternal traits and having them is not at all a bad thing.
ReplyDeleteSecond, I do agree with many of the commenters here and believe that Cameron's response after he was initially offended by the woman's beliefs that all stereotypes about gay men are real was more for laughs than because the show or its producers did not want to be too political. Modern Family is a comedic show and most of what is said and done is aimed to get people laughing.
Lastly, I do find it interesting that the show blurs the lines of heteronormative relationships in Cameron and Mitchell. Neither of them is clearly the "dominant" partner. Mitchell and Cameron have masculine and feminine qualities, which I feel is more praise-worthy than anything, as it shows how people (specifically gay men) are not always flamboyant or stoic. Of course, there are people for whom this is true, but Modern Family shows that there is not only black and white, but also grey. I personally find it appealing because as a gay man, I'm not always super-masculine or super-feminine, and I feel Modern Family's audience could benefit from seeing this lack of clarity when it comes to gendered depictions of behavior.
I feel that with television, with every step forward, they have to qualify or back track their progress. I agree with Michael, when given the chance to make a joke that plays to the majority, television comedies will take it. But I think our society has learned to expect to see these portrayals of extreme stereotypes and find them funny, so much so that they don't even realize that these jokes are actually offensive.
ReplyDeleteI find it interesting the parallel of how television can be both progressive and conforming at the same time. The progressive aspect comes in form of representation, as in the inclusion of queer characters in a show that is based on an institution that has been associated with heteronormativity, such as the family. Shows like Modern Family have gone beyond mere representation and have also had their progression come in the form of discourse, where stereotypes and roles are challenged. However, in the scene with Cameron and Katie the conformity takes place, along with the comedic effect, when the Cameron reaffirms Katie's stereotype thus restoring the hegemonic order. In the context of network television this could be considered a progressive show, in that it as the blog post states "challenges traditional conventions of gender" however, as the post also acknowledges, it does not resolve these issues. Nevertheless, this might bring up the question of whether something like american network television has ever really challenged hegemonic order in a way that is truly subversive? Or whether it is the space to do so? It seems to be aware of its sort of social responsibility to portray diverse characters, however it is still absent of complexity. This could go back to the idea discussed about in class about the queer and civil rights movements and how the latter only had the marginalized reappropriate priviledges of the mainstream.
ReplyDelete